Saturday, August 1, 2020

We're at War with Two Invisible Enemies

For tens of millions of Americans, hard times arrived this Friday. 

Here we go again?
Depression Bread Line
by George Segal,
FDR Museum, Washington, DC.

The supplemental $600 a week income boost for the unemployed expired at midnight. In general, that cuts unemployment benefits by more than half, to a payout of a few hundred dollars a week.

Also expired as of last week is a moratorium on evictions, which has kept a roof over the heads of some 43 million cash-strapped people. 
The hardest-hit Americans will be those who were poor to begin with. "Any cutback ... will hit the very segment of the population that spends virtually every penny of income," states Oxford Economics economist Bob Schwartz, who is quoted in a CBS article listed below. 

"The United States is at war," wrote three business-school professors in TheHill.com. The war is with COVID-19, they say, but they urge the government to "....R
eassess our strategy for fighting the economic war." Their ideas: Find a way to buy or back up failing consumer loans; provide direct assistance to people in need; and keep people in their jobs indirectly with a refundable corporate tax credit and wage subsidy of up to $2,500 per employee per month. 

Unemployment has risen with startling speed, especially in states that rely on tourism. 
We don't know officially, but the rates have approached the Great Depression's, which peaked at 25 percent. That's where Nevada is today, according to US News & World Report. 
Thanks to the Senate's delays in starting up a new COVID-19 relief bill, any further prospect of government assistance is in limbo.

The White House offered a late-night, too-little-too-late deal to extend the $600-a-week benefits for ONE (1) additional week, but Congressional leaders slapped it down. They thought that Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader, would then ignore all further efforts to pass a new relief bill. 

Still, even if a bill passed on Monday -- and it won't, because the Senate is in recess -- the country's unemployed will see a two- to four-week delay in any further benefit payouts.

It's historical deja vu. Remember how Republicans handled the Great Depression? After the stock market crashed in 1929, Herbert Hoover let Americans tough it out until he left office, while desperate people built tent camps in Central Park and elsewhere. Hoover was okay with spending his time playing golf. (Remind you of anyone?)

After four years of misery, Americans elected Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his New Deal. The plan's point man, Harry Hopkins, famously told Congressional conservatives, "People don't eat in the long run. They eat every day." 

This year, relief bills have kept the unemployed afloat -- until today. What will they eat tomorrow? How many will have to sleep under bridges with the long-term homeless? 

Be glad it's only a couple of months till the election. 


Is it worthwhile to go into further debt to combat this crisis? What do you think of the three professors' ideas in The Hill? What will the economy look like in November? 

Photo: Library of Congress
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eviction-moratorium-expired-coronavirus/?fbclid=IwAR2fIVg08S6m7t-OSOnhYX06EraeHQJm_LCGVJ-VZJCNrZB_lS-n7AsGwnU
 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-democrats-reject-white-house-unemployment-benefit-short-term-extension-600-dollar-cares-act/

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/510059-congress-must-open-a-second-front-in-our-economic-war-on-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR1fP3EQDNySL5YZrJqmI3NPwKJPW0q_Q_ha7DbqCEwq5yBMTn4XH4-IIw4

Friday, July 31, 2020

President Trump Unites the Nation

COVID-19 cases have surged across the country this week. Since the Pandemic started, more than 151,000 Americans have died. New unemployment claims also rose last week, the 19th week of a million or more new claims.

Trump forgot to check the
Constitution. Sad! 
 
The country and Donald Trump knew all that on Thursday morning.

Then, at 8:30 am, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that gross domestic product had tanked in the second quarter of the year. Fallen by 32.9% annualized. It was a low below the low we know -- a record-setting, utterly abysmal pratfall into a fearsomely deep pit.

Naturally, the stock market fell, because it's the kind of thing that makes Wall Streeters run around in circles with their hands in the air, screaming.

I don't know what goes through your mind at a time like this, but we know what went through Donald Trump's: "This is BAD NEWS for my reelection campaign!"

Sixteen minutes after the DOLS's announcement, the President tweeted one of his own: "With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 30, 2020

Thereby confirming that, yes, Donald Trump's educational years were spent in clown school.

“I think it’s a joke, I guess,” said Senator John Cornyn of Texas. “I don’t know how else to interpret it.”

Mirthless Mitch McConnell wasn't amused. “Never in the history of the country, through wars, depressions and the Civil War, have we ever not had a federally scheduled election on time, and we’ll find a way to do that again this Nov. 3,” the Senate majority leader said.

In a case of the chicken v. the egg, near-identical words emerged from Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., chairwoman of the committee that has jurisdiction over elections. "Americans have voted during the Civil War, in the midst of the Great Depression, in the shadow of World Wars, and in the wake of terrorist attacks," she said in a statement. "Americans will stand united to vote this November." Who quoted whom? Inquiring minds want to know!

In the driest response to date, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responded by tweeting the relevant lines of the Constitution:

Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states:
“The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.” https://t.co/NIaa7mQVnn— Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) July 30, 2020

In short, Donald Trump has united both parties in a single tweet.

The upshot? There are 97 days till the election, with Biden surfing what looks like an upcoming blue wave. At least that much is good news.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, Swaggering Texas Republican, Tests Positive for COVID-19

July 30, 2020

From the Schadenfreude Files


Remember Louie Gohmert, that right-wing congressman whose supporters, aka deplorables, roughed up a rival's supporters at a rally on Sunday?

Gohmert: We don't need no stink' masks


Remember how Gohmert complained repeatedly at yesterday's House Judiciary hearing, after a witness against Attorney General William Barr went over his time limit? Gohmert tapped loudly on his desk while the witness concluded.

Wednesday, Gohmert tested positive for COVID-19.

Later, Gohmert blamed his virus on being required to wear a mask during the hearings. By moving the mark around his face, Gohmert said, "...I'm bound to put some virus on the mask that I sucked in, that's most likely what happened."

Gohmert had the test because he was due to fly to Texas with Donald Trump on Air Force One on Wednesday. Instead, the mask-averse tough guy began a 10-day quarantine.

Now AG Barr has to be tested too, because Gohmert had a short-distance chat yesterday morning with Barr before the hearing.

There's no word yet on whether testing will be required for House Judiciary Committee members and staffers, witnesses, onlookers, and journalists who were also in the room.


Photo:  "Louie Gohmert - Caricature" by DonkeyHotey is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/…/texas-lawmaker-louie-goh…

https://www.usatoday.com/…/rep-gohmert-attribut…/5536431002/

Tuesday, July 28, 2020

AG Barr is Combative, Opaque and Cynical in House Hearing

July 29, 2020

The House Judiciary Committee hearing on questionable actions by the Department of Justice got volatile in a hurry this morning.

AG Barr gave Democrats the runaround during Tuesday's House hearings on the DOJ
The first witness, a former assistant attorney general, called Attorney General Bill Barr “the greatest threat in my lifetime to our rule of law." He then went over his five-minute time limit, prompting loud and repeated complaints from Representative Louie Gohmert. Gohmert is the congressman whose supporters in Tyler, TX roughed up his rival's supporters on Sunday.

Thwarted, Gohmert then tried to drown out the witness by tapping loudly on his desk.

Several witnesses later, it was Barr's turn to answer questions.

It was political theatre at its lowest, with House members interrupting Barr and Barr interrupting them -- and occasionally making sarcastic remarks.

Democrats brought out examples of Barr's seeming to do the President's bidding.

About dropping charges about Michael Flynn, the decision that led four prosecutors to resign? The FBI investigation had been so problematic, Barr said, that he didn't believe the facts supported the charges.

About Roger Stone's short sentence? “I agree the president's friends don’t deserve special breaks," Barr said, but they didn't deserve harsher treatment either. "Sometimes that is a different decision to make.”

At one point, Rep Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) showed a Trump memo threatening to "activate" Barr as if Barr was a tool in Trump's hands. Barr managed not to respond.

Jayapal asked Barr why he sent Federal troops to quell left-leaning protests but did not react against right-wing protesters.

She reminded Barr that protester "swarmed" the Michigan state capitol, carrying guns, displaying swastikas, Confederate flags, and a dark-haired doll, meant to represent the governor, with a noose around its neck, and called for the Governor to be lynched, shot, and beheaded.

Barr said he hadn't heard about the incident.

Barr's repeated interruptions seemed to be attempts to keep Jayapal from speaking. The exchange between the two got so heated that Jayapal at one point said she was starting to lose her temper.

Ultimately, Barr responded to almost every assertion by the House by disputing well-documented facts, saying he didn't remember, giving the incident a different spin, or all three. It was a performance of breathtaking cynicism.

Do you think the hearing will lead to any action on the part of the House? Is it even possible to get a usable response from someone who will not even agree on the facts of a well-documented incident? In what other ways can Democrats try to change Barr’s behavior or to remove Barr from his post? "William Barr - Caricature" by DonkeyHotey is licensed under CC BY 2.0



https://thehill.com/homenews/house/509465-democrats-blister-barr-during-tense-hearing?fbclid=IwAR0w3bClupK2ojo-7qk9QS7UtlGvaUe6GwIalPpS0EwzWxwSRn159RRcKxI
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2020/07/28/pramila-jayapal-bill-barr-lafayette-park-vpx.cnn
https://news.yahoo.com/house-barr-hearing-gohmert-tapping-interrupt-video-181642446.html

The Threat of Violence No Longer Hides in the Shadows

July 28, 2020


Partisan violence erupted in Tyler, Texas on Sunday, as counterprotesters carrying guns, Confederate flags, and bullhorns flooded a rally organized by a Democratic candidate for Congress. Cattle rancher Hank Gilbert is making a long-shot bid in a deep-red district, a district that Republican Louie Gohmert has held for eight terms.

Left, a counterprotester with White tattooed on one arm and "Pride" on the other.
Right, Gilbert's campaign manager, post-rally. 
Gilbert's rally was for supporters demon-strating against the Federal crackdown in Portland. The invaders, more numerous than the Gilbert supporters, arrived en-masse from a nearby "Blue Lives Matter" event that was scheduled in haste in response to Gilbert's rally. The counterprotesters wore MAGA hats and carried Trump-Pence signs. Many had White Pride tattoos. They used bullhorns to drown out Gilbert's speakers.

Video clips show Gohmert supporters shouting and pushing Gilbert's campaign manager into a wall that appears to be a marble monument. Another Gilbert supporter was punched in the 
Hank Gilbert, Democratic candidate 
breast, and another was choked in a one-hand hold and also pushed against the monument. Other, less consequential skirmishes broke out elsewhere in the crowd as well.

"The Tyler police were idly driving around the square in their patrol cars and waving at the counterprotesters," Gilbert said. As of late afternoon Monday, no charges have been filed. Gilbert has asked the FBI to look into the incident.

Asked for a comment, Gohmert responded with Trump-style verve. “I have no firsthand knowledge of what went on, 
Rep. Louie Gohmert. Trump 
calls him a "warrior."


because I was not there, did not organize it, didn’t know about it until it was taking place, and I was going to catch a plane back to Washington," he said.

He continued, "But what came to my mind is the violence Democrat leaders paid to create at Trump campaign events in 2016, followed by Democrats then claiming Donald Trump incited violence...There are Democrats and Marxists doing the same thing this year as well.”

Were you expecting something like this to happen? Are you expecting more such incidents? Have you been involved in protests that led to violence among the attendees? What would you do if it happened to you?




Photos from Hank Gilbert for Congress Facebook page and Gohmert for Congress website. 

Monday, July 27, 2020

Trump Invades Portland, Tear-Gasses Moms

July 22, 2020



Here was a crowd of protesters numbering almost a thousand. Over there were Trump's "federal" troops -- a de facto private police force. In the middle, a line of moms in yellow T shirts with their hands in the air, singing. They were tear gassed, along with dads who came with them.

The same night, the same federal thugs had no problem beating up a shambling bear of a middle-aged Navy vet who was there merely to talk to them -- to remind the veterans among them of their oath. Christopher David stood there and let them beat him and injure his hand severely until a faceful of pepper-spray forced him to walk away.

There is a line of civility that few governments will cross in public. Tear gassing peaceful protestors used to be one of them. Beating nonviolent protesters did too. Both defy our Constitutional right to peaceably assemble. 

The Denver police used flashbangs and tear gas for crowd control at a George Floyd
protest on May 30, 2020. Federal troops used similar tactics on the ""wall of moms."



  We've seen it from local police forces since George Floyd died of suffocation under a policeman's knee. According to ProPublica.org, some 40 cities have vowed to make changes in how police perform their jobs.

But that was not in response to the overly forceful treatment of protesters who have merely made the police nervous. That remains an obvious problem. ProPublica outlines several recent incidents.

The Civil Rights movement made progress, in part, because of outrage, particularly from the violence caught on film and broadcast across America. The outrage of brutality by Alabama troopers, clubbing peaceful protestors, including John Lewis, at the Edmond Pettus Bridge.

They were fighting Jim Crow. Today, we're fighting for freedoms we thought we already had, rights guaranteed in the Constitution. The time for outrage against federal overreach is now.

Are there better, more peaceful ways to manage large groups of protesters? Do you see any clear-cut line between what can be allowed and what should never be? What will you do?

The Worst of Times for a Presidential Election


7/25/2020 


The hanging-chad debacle of 2000 already messed up one presidential election. Now it looks as if it's ready to ruin another. If it does, the country will face a crisis like no other.

Audry as a wee lass.
Since then, election officials in at least 14 states have turned to paperless, electronic voting systems that have proven imperfect. Pratfall-making, even. In the 2020 primaries, problems with Iowa Democrats' mobile voting app made Florida's 2000 problems look quaint. California, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia all had voting nightmares. With a few exceptions, the voting problems differ from one system to another, so that November 3 threatens to create individual "Little Shops of Horrors" across the country. Election day could see a thousand Audreys bloom.*

When the polls close, we could face a truly scary situation. Remember the aftermath of the butterfly ballots? While Democrats hesitated, Republican political fixer Jim Baker bused in angry young men from other states. Their task was to intimidate haggard vote-counters in precinct offices who were eyeballing individual paper ballots to figure out what voters' intentions had been. With surly protesters filling precinct lobbies (and worse), some election officials simply gave up and called the votes for George W. Bush. 

And remember, all that was in ONE county in Florida -- not 14 states whose election systems are still vulnerable to incursions from Russian and Chinese hackers. Add to that the voting by mail, which relies on the Postal System, whose new head, a Trump donor, declares that he plans to slow down deliveries. Around a third of poll workers, who typically volunteer year after year, are too old and vulnerable to COVID-19 to serve in this pandemic, and because there are fewer volunteers, there will be fewer places to vote. Even then,  those manning the polls may include more inexperienced newcomers.

Little Audrey, all growed up and hungry for blood.
This year, we have a uniquely divided electorate and a uniquely corrupt president who hints frequently that he "may or may not" accept the election results. Many of the nation's loudest gun owners and right wingnuts are in Trump's camp, and his base has become ever more resistant to hearing information that they find disagreeable. These are the folks who think COVID-19 is a hoax and wearing masks is an assault on their freedom. Meanwhile, foreign hackers have focused on undermining Americans' faith in the electoral system and in each other. An inconclusive vote could lead to ... nothing good.

“My biggest concern for the fall election is an election administrator’s job," Washington’s Republican secretary of state told author Graff. "[It] is to convince the losers that they lost.” 

Does the upcoming election scare you? What would you do if Trump disputes the election results? Would you believe the result if Trump won?



*Little Shop of Horrors was a Broadway show and film that centered on a blood-drinking, meat-eating plant (like a Venus flytrap) named Audrey. (Spoiler alert!) Yes, it ate people.

Photo, young Audrey: Ahem. The origin of this photo is lost in the mists of time.
Photo, grown-up Audrey: https://www.moviefone.com/2016/12/17/little-shop-of-horrors-facts/

 

Will We Stay Afloat or Sink with the Latest COVID-19 Relief Bill?

July 27, 2020


Nancy Pelosi, here speaking to an audience
that, unlike the Senate, will do what she asks.

Congress will stay in session until a COVID-19 relief plan passes the Senate, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Sunday's Face the Nation, a broadcast show with newsmaker interviews. 

Two months after the House passed a $3 trillion bill for Phase IV of the plan to shore up the finances of vulnerable Americans, the Senate was still sitting on the bill, only releasing trial balloons. This weekend, with enhanced unemployment benefits on the cusp of expiring, the Senate got serious about turning the House's bill into a $1 trillion bill. Here's what we know about the Senate's plan as of early Sunday evening:

* "Many" individual Americans will receive $1200 in direct relief.

* The moratorium on evictions will be extended.

* The enhanced unemployment provisions of $600 per week will not be renewed.

The bill aimed to encourage people to stay home to dampen COVID-19's spread. The current White House Chief of Staff, Mark Meadows, says that the time to keep people home has passed. Republicans particularly disliked seeing some people make more money from unemployment than they earned when they were working.

Treasury Department head Steve Mnuchin wants to have unemployment amount to 70 percent of the employees' original wage. Pelosi counters that figuring out the total via percentage of wages will muck up the distribution process. Meadows acknowledges the difficulty, but Republicans plan to move forward regardless.

* Liability protection for businesses? This evening, unknown.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has been determined to include liability protection for businesses in the bill -- that is, to make sure that employees who get sick can't sue their employers.

Right now, "essential" employees, many of whom make low wages, must work because they are ineligible for unemployment if they quit.

Nancy Pelosi points out that businesses that can't be sued will have no incentive to minimize health risks.


About that Budget.
  The Congressional Budget Office announced on July 8 that the federal budget deficit was an estimated $2.7 trillion in the first nine months of fiscal 2020, which runs September 1 to August 31. That's $2.0 trillion more than in the same period last year. The federal budget for 2020 was $4.79 trillion.
 


What is most important to you about the Phase IV bill? What do you want to see included? What should be left out? Will this effort help keep the economy from collapse?

"Immigration Nation" Is a Terror Story for ICE Officials

July 26, 2020


On Thursday, the New York Times published a bombshell story: The Department of Homeland Security threatened two filmmakers with lawsuits in a blatantly unconstitutional attempt at extra-judicial prior restraint. 

It had to be outside the court system. The DHS wanted to muzzle the film, "Immigration Nation," until after the 2020 election.

The last president to try a stunt like that was Richard Nixon, and the government's bid to keep the "Pentagon Papers" out of The Washington Post failed. Besides, the legal effort to block Too Much and Never Enough by Mary Trump, had been a bust. 

Bambi: Sweet, innocent, and utterly unlike what
ICE saw when it reviewed the preliminary cut.
The DHS walked itself into today's situation in 2017 by granting the filmmakers, Shaul Schwartz and Christina Clusiau, exceptional access to the workings of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for a documentary that will be released on Netflix on August 3.

The couple's prior works included "Trophy," a prizewinning documentary that did not glorify big-game hunting, and, for Schwartz, "Narco Cultura," a complex look at drug culture. (Both are available on Amazon Prime.)

Maybe DHS officials thought "Trophy" was an inoffensive Public Broadcasting-style critterfest. Maybe they thought that ICE would be Disneyfied.

Over 2-1/2 years, the filmmakers wound up with scenes showing ICE agents lying to and mocking immigrants, thrilling at an OK to arrest additional immigrants, and even picking a lock on an apartment building. They also showed ICE agents saving the lives of dehydrated immigrants trying to cross the desert on foot. 

The couple were allowed to talk to immigrants and staff members, a rare form of access, and the film tells the stories of several, including one grandmother who had refused to give up her 12-year-old granddaughter to a local MS-13 gang for what the Times calls "a forced marriage." The grandmother requested asylum because of death threats. (MS-13 is a loose association of individual gangs with many branches in the United States.) 

When Schwartz and Clusiau sent the six-part draft to ICE officials, as they had agreed to do, the official who had worked with them hit the ceiling and, one presumes, left a dent. ICE officials threatened to sue the filmmakers' production company (and not Netflix). They demanded that the couple delete several embarrassing scenes. There was yelling, and lots of it. 

It was naked intimidation, but the upshot was that lawyers for the opposing sides negotiated an agreement -- and the documentary got publicity to die for. 

As for the effect on Donald Trump, just recall that, in 1971, Richard Nixon was reelected.



Why did ICE officials think that intimidation would work, and why did they think they'd get away with it? Was DHS remiss in not anticipating the kind of film the couple would produce? Are you going to watch "Immigration Nation" when it's released on Netflix?


And BTW, thumbs up to Caitlyn Dickerson, the reporter who broke this story. All the other articles on this topic lean on hers.


Photo "Bambi" by Mark Iocchelli is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0















Are Conservatives Yearning for the Inequality of Yesteryear?


 
July 24, 2020



Greed, racism, and more greed were on full display in Washington, DC this week.

In the first case, Republicans in the Senate and the administration blew enough holes in a House bill to sink a provision that required employers to provide paid sick leave.

In the second, the Trump administration scissored away a 2015 rule designed to combat housing discrimination, replacing it with a rule that ... well ... makes discrimination easier.

Trump explicitly linked the rule change to his reelection bid, leaning on the conservative trope that suburbia is full of non-working, house-proud white women. In a tweet to "The Suburban Housewives of America," Trump thundered that "Biden will destroy your neighborhood...!"

"If you call me a 'suburban housewife,' I will knee you in the fucking groin," responded one mother of three who works full time. Her comment echoed an avalanche of other such remarks.

As a child of the 1950s, Trump's vision was forged in his early years, including his years learning to strong-arm minority tenants that Trump's father saw as a variety of vermin. They say that conservatives don't like change. Trump simply ignores it. 

But back to paid sick leave. In a (deeply biased) news article on Thursday, Huffpo's Emily Peck highlighted the plight of "essential workers" -- including janitors, grocery-store workers, meatpackers, and chicken processors -- who were forced to work whether they were sick or not, a sure way to spread COVID-19 and misery.

Think of this man as a politician hauling you
backward into the past.
The House passed bills in March and in May that would have extended paid sick leave to these people. But even after the Senate passed an emaciated version of the bill in March, the Labor Department carved out an exemption for health care workers. In all, 83 percent of employed workers got no additional sick leave, according to the National Partnership for Women.

The working poor, in short, got the knob end of the drumstick. Like Trump's hopelessly tin-eared tweet, the Senate's failure to help essential workers get sick leave is like another step backwards in time -- to the days before OSHA, before the Fair Labor Standards Act, to the decades and centuries before that when the poorer the people, the poorer they'd stay.

In this era, the Senate and administration are pulling tow ropes against working people trying to move toward a better future. Is this the fate of the American Dream?

Let's restate Gatsby: So working Americans beat on, boats against the current -- borne by greedy, moneyed politicians back ceaselessly into the past. 







"Paying For Blisters"
by Rum Bucolic Ape is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0


Bruni: "So This is Your Idea of Freedom?"

July 23, 2020


From Frank Bruni, one of my fave columnists, in a New York Times newsletter yesterday:

"Our struggle with this pandemic has convinced me that somewhere along the way, we went from celebrating individual liberty to fetishizing it, so that for too many Americans, all sense of civic obligation and communal good went out the window," Bruni wrote. We seem to conflate freedom with selfishness, convenience, and personal comfort, he adds. 

Bruni is talking about people who refuse to wear masks. They're among a number of Americans who believe that personal freedom must be protected at all costs, even if the costs are borne by others who suffer for their (possibly cockamamie) ideas and behavior. In short, individual freedom trumps community interests.

Conservatives are like
Cyrano de Bergerac:
They stand proud and alone 
because they're ugly
and nobody loves them.
(Just kidding! Sorry, Mom!)

"[This] has been the core animating theory behind the American gun rights movement: reduce the debate to an absolutist fight about freedom, wrote Dahlia Lithwick in Slate.com this May, "that eventually narcotizes an entire population into believing that the cost of true liberty is tens of thousands of avoidable gun deaths each year."

Thus, she says, any step toward gun regulation "is cast as a dire step toward tyranny."

We've heard that the only statistically measurable difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals have a higher tolerance for things that are disgusting (seriously!).

It's debatable that such a clear distinction has been overlooked in studies seeking the difference between liberals and conservatives. The only measurable statistical difference, we've heard, is that liberals have a higher tolerance for things that are disgusting (seriously!).

It's "I did it my way" versus "Lean on me."

Is this the real difference between liberals and conservatives -- a desire to see the community safe, housed, and free to speak versus a desire to stand high and alone against a teeming mass of strangers?

Did the conservative "regulate me not" drive America's sense of manifest destiny -- or excuse it? What is the weakness in either point of view?



Photo: "Bergerac_Cyrano" by dadotres is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/05/freedom-li

"Masks Do Not Work with Viruses," and Other "Facts" from Upside-Down World

July 21, 2020



"Masks do not work with viruses," declared Dan Forest, the Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina, earlier this year.

Forest had a top-notch source -- a paper from the New England Journal of Medicine. A single line of that paper backed up Forest's claim. But the point of the paper was the opposite. The authors had to write a letter to the journal to clarify.

That's what happens when cognitive dissonance spreads across the country, like a pandemic that afflicts only Republicans. The short-term cure appears to be seeking out false facts. 

That short-term cure is all the rage in upside-down world. Don't like the news? Demonize and ignore the mainstream media. Don't like what an expert says? Find another.

Better yet, find an expert who'll generate the information that you want to hear. An expert like, say, Dr. Deborah Birx.

Deborah Birx, M.D.
Birx, chair of the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, has sterling credentials. To quote the State Department, "Ambassador-at-Large, Deborah L. Birx, M.D., is the Coordinator of the United States Government Activities to Combat HIV/AIDS and U.S. Special Representative for Global Health Diplomacy." She's spent her career as a researcher on HIV/AIDS -- granted, not a COVID-19 sort of disease, but her public-health competence is proven.

When she got to the White House, however, she produced analyses of COVID-19 data filtered through a University of Washington program that proved to be ... not quite accurate. Until then, for weeks and months, she assured the Trump administration that the virus had peaked, that the trajectory was identical to Italy's, and that their major task was to "extinguish the embers" of the pandemic.

The CDC lost its role last week as the first recipient of pandemic data from U.S. hospitals because Birx needed quicker analytical results than the CDC could provide. She chose another analytical program that she had used before and announced that data would go to the White House first.

In short, Birx will be the scapegoat for every goof, stumble, and shortfall of the White House's failed COVID-19 response from now till the end of time. Never mind that she was probably chosen for her biases as well as her expertise. Never mind that the White House listened to her above (or instead of) all other experts.

We hear that Birx doesn't deserve sympathy. By all reports, she has used a keen political sense throughout her career. Anthony Fauci describes her as a "different animal" from himself.

Deservedly or not, it's likely that Birx will hang by her silk scarf from the White House portico as if she was the one who wielded the power on the inside.

Maybe she deserves blame. But when Dan Forest, or Donald Trump, cites Birx for his next boneheaded claim, don't be surprised.



https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/us/article/Fact-Check-Republican-lawmaker-says-masks-do-15416648.php?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HC_DailyHeadlines&utm_term=news&utm_content=headlines
https://www.state.gov/biographies/deborah-l-birx-md/

Scuffle with Civil Rights Activist Leads to Charges for Two Indiana Men

Vauxx Rush Booker on a happier
occasion, from his Facebook page
.
July 19, 2020


There's plenty of ill will sloshing around near a lakeside beach in Bloomington, Indiana this month thanks to an ugly conflict that occurred July 4th, when a local civil-rights activist, Vauxx Booker, and a small group of friends of unreported ethnicity crossed paths with a semi-inebriated group of white people.

The family of one of those white people, Caroline McCord, owned the land; another man in that group was her boyfriend, Sean Purdy. Booker and his group were heading to a Monroe County beach to watch a lunar eclipse and apparently thought the land was part of a public park.

Booker's group continued on after apologizing for trespassing, Booker says.

McCord's land may have been a well-known shortcut, because there were several bystanders who took video of what followed when Booker's group retraced their steps a few hours later, when they again encountered McCord's and Purdy's group.

According to the white group, McCord told them he was a county commissioner and said they were "in violation." Booker is, in fact, a member of the Monroe County Human Rights Commission, but his saying so didn't help the atmosphere.

Words were had. Punches were thrown. And while Purdy held Booker against a tree, head down, someone yelled "get a noose!"

That remark isn't on anyone's video, but it made a big impression on Booker, who called 911 at his first opportunity.

The Indiana Department of Natural Resources took two weeks to investigate, producing a 68-page report. Today, two men of the white group were charged with crimes.

Sean Purdy was charged with three felonies: criminal confinement, battery, and intimidation. His friend Jerry Cox was charged with helping out with the criminal confinement and battery, both felonies; and intimidation and two counts of battery, both misdemeanors.

The investigation reported that Booker and one other person in his group may also have committed crimes stemming from the fisticuffs at the encounter.

The FBI is investigating the incident as a hate crime.

Do you think this incident was racially based harassment, or just an example of drunken partiers picking a fight? Will the argument turn Indiana into a racial tinderbox? What's the best possible outcome of this incident? What's the worst?


https://indianapublicmedia.org/news/dnr-releases-details-of-lake-monroe-investigation.php
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2020/07/17/lake-monroe-alleged-racist-assault-vauxx-booker-sean-purdy-jerry-cox/5458700002/
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/crime/2020/07/16/vauhxx-booker-lake-monroe-case-potential-crimes/5454531002/



Will Trump Honor John Lewis with a New Voting Rights Act?

July 19, 2020


John Lewis died on Friday of pancreatic cancer.

On Saturday, Trump tweeted a message of appreciation, calling him a "civil rights hero."

On Sunday, Trump joked about renaming Ft. Bragg after Al Sharpton.

In the meantime, Trump's buddy Roger Stone mumbled that he didn't "want to argue with this Negro" in a live interview with  African-American radio-show host Morris O'Kelly.

Oops! Another faux pas, but Trump's base forgives him.
Who couldn't, with that adorable little-boy face?

 
These are mixed messages from POTUS and friends to be sure, but congressman James Clyburn of South Carolina, the House majority whip, gave Trump a way to prove he supported civil rights: Pass a new voting rights bill.

“It should be the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of 2020," he said in a CNN interview. "Words may be powerful, but deeds are lasting.”

The first Voting Rights Act went into law in 1965, a few months after a policeman cracked Lewis' skull with a baton on the Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama.

The voting rights law took a punch in the gut in 2013 when the Supreme Court held that the need for the Voting Rights Act had largely passed, so changes in voting rules didn't require approval in advance from the federal government.

The rewritten Voting Rights Act passed the House in December.

"It's laid out the way the Supreme Court asked us to lay it out," Clyburn said. "And if the President were to sign that, then I think that's what we would do to honor John."

Considering his focus on being reelected, is it in Trump's best interests to shepherd the new Voting Rights Act into law?  Would his base agree if he did? What do you think it would take to make Trump sign the bill?



Photo:  "Donald Trump" by Gage Skidmore is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/19/politics/jim-clyburn-john-lewis-voting-rights-cnntv/index.html
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/508040-trump-mocks-push-to-rename-fort-bragg-were-going-to-name-it-after-the
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/507991-roger-stone-uses-racial-slur-in-interview-with-black-radio-host

In Memoriam: John Lewis, 1940-2020

July 18, 2020

"The fare was paid in blood."

That was how Lewis put it years later, in his graphic novel "March." For Lewis, it was, most certainly.

John Lewis receives the Presidential Medal of Freedom
from President Barack Obama on February 15, 2011.


It's one thing to stand up for a cause. It's something else to be willing to be knocked down, bleeding, over and over again for that cause. That's what Lewis did.

He was beaten outside a whites-only restroom during the first Freedom Ride in 1961.

After the Riders met so much violent resistance that the original organizer gave it up, Lewis and a friend kept the Freedom Ride going.

Lewis spent weeks in a notorious prison farm after being arrested in Mississippi. But later that year, all interstate travel facilities were integrated.

In 1963, Lewis was the youngest and most radical speaker at the history-making Walk on Washington, where Martin Luther King, Jr., gave his "I Have a Dream" speech.

Lewis had his skull fractured in 1965 in a march for voting rights as the group tried to cross the Edmund Pettus bridge in Selma, Alabama. The Voting Rights Act became law later that year.

Lewis's friends got used to him showing up with fresh bandages in new places when he came to meetings of groups such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, which he helped found.

Even before that, when he was still just 19, Lewis was in the first sit-in at a Woolworth's dining counter in North Carolina.

Lewis became a Georgia congressman in 1986 and remained in that position the rest of his life. He applied the dogged hard-work ethic he learned as the child of sharecroppers to continue his fight for civil rights. Year after year, Lewis introduced legislation for the National Museum of African American History and Culture every year until it passed in 2003. The museum is on the National Mall.

He was instrumental in getting the Voting Rights Act reauthorized and in having a "minority health research center" instituted at the National Institutes of Health.

He was called the "Conscience of the Congress" and received the Presidential Medal of Honor from Barack Obama in 2011.

Lewis and his wife, who died in 2012, had one child, a son named John-Miles.

8/28/21 Once Again, the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally is a COVID19 Super-Spreader

In 2020, the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally was linked to 649 COVID19 cases in 29 states, a CDC study said. In 2021, the rally did much the same t...