Saturday, August 8, 2020

US Intelligence Wades Warily into Public Disclosure


In Friday's press release about pre-election cyber attacks, National Director of Counterintelligence William Evanista doubled down on statements he made in a press release on July 24.

In short: Foreign enemies of the United States will try to influence Americans' opinions and Americans' trust in the voting process.

Russia, China, and Iran are the most active countries trying to meddle, but they're working at cross purposes.
America's counterintelligence honcho assures the nation that foreign
nations can't mess up the voting system -- not very much, anyhow.


CHINA is tired of Donald Trump's whiplash policies, and prefers the more predictable Biden. (This part of the press release is worded with almost comical delicacy.) China wants the U.S. to quit bucking its actions -- specifically, its takeover of Hong Kong, its attempted takeover of the South China Sea, and its efforts to dominate the 5G market.

China's regime does not like Americans treating TikTok as a Trojan horse, nor was it happy to see its consulate closed in Houston. China’s efforts focus on pressuring US politicians to support Chinese policies, and to cancel out criticism.

IRAN wants to get rid of Trump and his heavy-handed treatment of the Iranian government. It's trying to influence the election by manipulating Americans on-line.

RUSSIA wants Donald Trump for a second term. Of course. Trump seems to trust Vladimir Putin the way a child trusts Daddy.

Russia's tactic is to badmouth Joe Biden, who supported Ukraine's anti-Putin sentiments when he was Vice President to Barack Obama.

This year, Ukraine's pro-Trump lawmaker, Andriy Derkach, has made claims about Biden’s and his son Hunter's supposed corruption and attempts to put down the Democratic Party. Meanwhile, Russian operatives manipulate American opinions on-line to help Trump's candidacy.

Russia has also been sniffing around the voting process and accessing local voter rolls. Evanina says, however, that foreign actors can't manipulate the votes themselves without extensive effort, and even then, it would be "difficult for our adversaries to interfere with or manipulate voting results at scale." Reassuring, huh?

More detail, from Evanista's July 24 release: "Today, we see our adversaries seeking to compromise the private communications of U.S. political campaigns, candidates and other political targets. Our adversaries also seek to compromise our election infrastructure, and we continue to monitor malicious cyber actors trying to gain access to U.S. state and federal networks, including those responsible for managing elections. However, the diversity of election systems among the states, multiple checks and redundancies in those systems, and post-election auditing all make it extraordinarily difficult for foreign adversaries to broadly disrupt or change vote tallies without detection."


Do you think that we need a comparison of how well and how much the different countries are weaseling through the wires? (That was Democrats' criticism of the disclosures.) Should we ask how well the United States is doing in defending the country against foreign influence? Do you think that candidates are enlisting foreign help to win elections, as Trump allegedly did before the 2016 elections?

"rule-41-act" by Electronic_Frontier_Foundation is licensed under CC BY 2.0

Friday, August 7, 2020

Republicans Ding Democrats Over a Bill Never Meant to Pass

“As long as they calculate that they’re better off politically doing nothing, it’s going to be hard for us to move forward,” Florida's Senator Marco Rubio, a Republican, told reporters recently.

"They" are Congress's Democrats.

Welcome, again, to Upside-Down World. The House bill passed in May, and the Senate didn't move so much as a pencil till the week enhanced unemployment benefits ended in late July. The Republican-heavy Senate is dragging its feet and lying about it. Surprise!

Senate Republicans holler "Obstruction!," but their relief bill isn't
meant to pass. It's meant to slow down or deny help to the poor.

True, the House is not going to accept the Senate version of the relief bill. It's probably designed to be impassable. The bill does little for the poor. It even shields employers from liability if slipshod safety measures lead to workers getting COVID-19.

The bill would not only bar employees from suing employers, but it would allow employers to sue employees.
Employees who get COVID-19 would have to give up their firstborn male child in exchange for annoying the boss. (Did you realize I was kidding?) That provision would last till October 2024! 

The Senate bill would also spend hundreds of millions of dollars to serve Trump's business interests.

Anyone who is not Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell would blush over this bucket of bullpucky. Even so, by not passing this bill, Republicans say, the House is being "obstructionist."

The bill is going nowhere anytime soon. Senate Republicans have been fighting each other over every jot, tittle, and dime in the bill. While the House wants to resume a supplemental $600 a week for the unemployed, Republicans only agree that $600 is too much.

Meanwhile, House Democrats are negotiating with Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who are the Scylla and Carybdis of forward movement.

McConnell isn't even part of the negotiations, and senators are taking a long weekend, because they're itching to go home and play and campaign -- it's August!

It looks as though Republicans are running out the clock so that any relief benefits will arrive closer to the election. Republicans will then make an extra dollar look like a miracle whose creator is Donald Trump. His supporters seem to believe anything.





Does this Senate side-step look to you like a chance to bring glory to Donald Trump? Or is the Senate full of skinflints? Is the House right in holding fast against the Senate Republicans? Did you believe that line about the first-born male child, even for a second? (Inquiring minds want to know!)

Thursday, August 6, 2020

How Much Will America's Cyber Experts Tell the American Public?

When I used a free web host for my websites a decade ago, China was cutting its teeth in cybercrime by messing with Americans' host servers. There were regular attacks, and they were coming from a military college.

In 2016, Russia was messing with Americans' minds, intensifying the country's divisions and backing Donald Trump's candidacy as best they could. In his 2019 report, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law."

Russia and China haven't stopped trying to harm the United States, and Russia is once again backing Donald Trump's campaign. The House and, on Monday, the Senate were briefed on cybercrimes in classified meetings with senior intelligence officials. Monday's meeting was about campaign meddling and campaign security.

Russia is again churning out disinformation and conspiracy theories.
Foreign powers are manipulating American voters to help Donald Trump.
Democrats say that Russia has also helped the Senate's Republicans to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, who had a five-year stint on the board of Ukraine's biggest natural gas producer. Donald Trump himself pressured Ukraine to aid the investigation, even holding up aid money.

According to Politico, Ukrainians and a Russian lawmaker have also been passing along tidbits of information that are favorable to Donald Trump and harmful to Joe Biden.

Politico
also says that "Democrats have been openly pressuring the Trump administration to be more specific about Russia’s interference operation, which lawmakers say is more sophisticated than it was in 2016."

Democrats and Republicans both want more of the foreign nations' cybercrimes to become public, but Democrats have more to gain from disclosures to the public.

How much will the National Intelligence people divulge? We don't know. We also don't know how well and completely all that intelligence work has been carried out.

It's all part of a world of shadows played out in one of the deepest, hottest circles of hell on earth.



"#bebest-michael-nuccitelli-ipredator-cyberstalking" by iPredator is licensed under CC0 1.0

Should Americans know specifically how Russia has targeted the U.S. elections? Should they know where China focuses its cyberintelligence? Do you think that Trump and the Republican party have been successful in using the Russians to their own advantage?

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/03/2020-intel-election-interference-391047 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hunter-biden-ukraine/what-hunter-biden-did-on-the-board-of-ukrainian-energy-company-burisma-idUSKBN1WX1P7

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Surprise! Trump Touts Mail-In Voting in Florida

Right up until August 3 -- Monday -- President Trump hadn't yet realized that his shots at mail-in voting are hitting him in the foot. 

It's easy to see where his convictions came from. With Democrats advocating loudly for mail-in voting, Trump may have believed that mail-ins benefit Democrats more than Republicans.

Elderly voters favor mail-in voting. So do Americans
worried about catching COVID-19.


Sure, mail-ins make voting easier for a lot of people. Sure, it would help voters who fear getting COVID-19 when they go in person to the polls. But in Trump's paranoid mind, if Democrats want mail-in ballots, it means that mail-ins are better for Democrats than for him.

Trump has insisted that mail-in votes will create election fraud. Statistically, it seems, most mail-in voters are Democrats. Mark Stern of Slate.com posits that Trump could stop counting mail-in ballots that come in after Election Day, which would theoretically disenfranchise more Democrats than Republicans.

Bear in mind that Trump recently appointed an avid supporter to run the Postal Service. The new appointee has deliberately slowed down the postal system. Among other measures, he is restricting the hours that postal workers can use sorting machines.

Till Monday, Trump apparently hadn't realized that mail-in ballots also make voting easier for the elderly, and a ton of elderly voters are Republicans. Nor had he realized that his fraudulent accusations of fraud have scared the Republican elderly away from voting by mail.

As a result, many would rather not vote at all, according to a Politico article published Monday. The article says that "15 percent of Trump voters in Florida, 12 percent in Pennsylvania and 10 percent in Michigan — said that getting a ballot in the mail would make them less likely to vote in November."

Sometime Monday, reality dawned on the President. Trump realized that he'd have to reassure his Florida mail-in voters that their ballots would be counted fair and square. Either that, or the GOP's yammerings finally got through.

Tuesday, Trump was down in the Python State telling his acolytes that Florida's ballots would be fine because Florida's voting system, uniquely, hadn't been tainted by meddling Democrats. How he'll approach his voters in Pennsylvania and Michigan is unknown.



"Vote!" by Robert Stinnett is licensed under CC BY 2.0



Monday, August 3, 2020

Any COVID-19 Relief Bill Must Benefit the White House

How much moss gathers on a COVID-19 relief bill as it rolls downhill? Quite a lot, thanks to the White House.

President Trump has insisted repeatedly on a payroll tax cut, which would give a tiny bump to employers and employees, but nothing to the unemployed.

Trump insists on a payroll tax cut, a West Wing renovation, and
$175 billlion to keep the FBI's headquarters near his Washington hotel.


If an employer pays lower payroll taxes, that means the Federal Government will end up with less money. Nobody has said which part of the Federal Government will take a hit in the wallet. Will that mean that less money gets to Defense, or to Medicare, or to Social Security? Any guesses?

The Donald has also demanded that the bill include $377 million to renovate the West Wing. What does that have to do with COVID-19 relief?

To top that off, Trump wants the bill to redirect $1.75 billion to build a new FBI headquarters on the HQ's current site, which is one block away from the Trump International Hotel.

Otherwise, the HQ will be built in the suburbs, which would be cheaper and far less disruptive for the agency.

But Trump wants the FBI to stay right next to his hotel. Why? Because otherwise, a new hotel may be built there, and the new hotel would compete with Trump’s hotel.


Hours ago, Trump announced that he won't okay Microsoft's purchase of Tik Tok without an additional, "substantial" payment to the U.S. Treasury. It's not going into Trump's pocket, but it's still a kickback.

Are you hearing that nails-on-a-blackboard sound? Yes, that's how Trump does business.

Once the Republicans iron out these details with the White House, they get to try to muscle the Democrats into accepting a relief bill that doesn’t offer as much relief for Americans as the Democrats want it to include.

There will be high winds on Capitol Hill for days to come.


Photo:
"Donald Trump" by Gage Skidmore is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/administration-wants-dollar377m-for-west-wing-remodel-in-virus-relief-bill/ar-BB17ljxq?ocid=sf


Also:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/trump-says-tiktok-sale-can-go-through-but-only-if-the-us-gets-a-cut/ar-BB17woF9?ocid=sf
https://apnews.com/286874ea989dc54654f74d24e087a419https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-fbi-headquarters-location-suddenly-important-again-n123
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/508240-gop-signals-trumps-payroll-tax-cut-in-republican-coronavirus-bill-for-now4802
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/07/even-republicans-eye-rolling-trump-coronavirus-relief-bill-demands
https://www.newsweek.com/lawmakers-resist-fbi-spending-coronavirus-bill-trumps-377m-white-house-remodeling-money-draws-1521707https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/21/politics/payroll-tax-cut-trump-congress-relief-negotiations/index.html

Sunday, August 2, 2020

Landlords Must Keep Their Heads as Eviction Moratorium Ends


Landlord-tenant disputes rarely end in murder by sword. Jerry Thompson, 42, of Hartford, CT, thought he was a "sovereign citizen," not subject to anyone else's laws, and he ended his eviction problems with landlord and roommate Victor King in three strokes.
Arizona landlords: Beware of
angry tenants this Halloween.
 


Thompson now has housing for life.

Landlords, though, may have earned some sympathy from being in danger. 

Until July 25, there has been a federal moratorium on evictions in response to exploding unemployment due to the COVID-19 crisis. Now, evictions are legal again, but states, cities, and even federal agencies have stepped in to provide a patchwork of extensions.

Two federal agencies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, prohibit evictions until August 31 of single-family properties with loans backed by the agencies, and you can even find the addresses of those properties on line (
https://nlihc.org/federal-moratoriums).
 
In the District of Columbia, evictions are banned till 60 days after the COVID crisis ends.

In Hawaii, Florida, and Illinois, they're banned till late August. In Oregon, till October. In New Jersey, till October 5. Massachusetts, till October 17. 

In California, more than 120 local laws exist to discourage or ban evictions.

In Texas, where evictions have resumed, Houston has kicked another $16 million into a fund for rent assistance. The original fund of $15 million was fully claimed in about one hour.

In New York City, Mayor Bill DeBlasio opened a landlord-tenant mediation program in mid-July. 

Many states and municipalities have restricted utility shutoffs as well.

Landlords do have something to fear. Take Arizona's eviction ban, which ends on October 31. It brings up the scary prospect of tenants in Jason masks terrorizing their landlords on Halloween.

Because of Jerry Thompson, who's not the only oddball tenant in America, bizarre instances of violence are no longer unthinkable.  



Should the federal government revive and extend the national eviction moratorium? Should landlords be subsidized if they don't evict tenants who are on unemployment? Should landlords hold off on evictions for their own safety? Where would families go in your town if they're newly homeless? 


Image from Pinterest. Creator unknown. 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/31/us/hartford-sword-homicide-trnd/index.html

State-by-state extensions of eviction moratoriums: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/emergency-bans-on-evictions-and-other-tenant-protections-related-to-coronavirus.html

Addresses of tenants protected by Fannie Mae/Fannie Mac restrictions: https://nlihc.org/federal-moratoriums

Also: https://therealdeal.com/2020/07/21/city-unveils-landlord-tenant-mediation-program-to-avoid-evictions/
https://www.nj.com/coronavirus/2020/07/your-landlord-cant-lock-you-out-in-nj-even-when-federal-protections-expire.html



8/28/21 Once Again, the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally is a COVID19 Super-Spreader

In 2020, the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally was linked to 649 COVID19 cases in 29 states, a CDC study said. In 2021, the rally did much the same t...